AZAADVILLE MUFTIS AND MOLVIS MISLEADING THE UMMAH
BROTHER MUHAMMAD KAJEE OF GAUTENG DRAWS THE ATTENTION OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY TO THE DEVIATION OF THE MUFTIS AND MOLVIS OF AZAADVILE. WE REPRODUCE THE LETTER HE WROTE TO THE AZAADVILLE’S MUFTI MOTARA.
ASSALAAM MUFTI MOTARA OF DARUL ULOOM AZAADVILLE
I HAVE ALSO READ YOUR SO-CALLED FATWA AND HAVE REALISED THAT YOU COVERING UP FOR SANHA. TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS WHICH YOU SHOULD NOT TRY TO HIDE:
1) MUFTI MOTARA SAYS "I have received your email correspondence and perused its contents. I do understand your
disappointment at not having received replies from Mufti Muhammed Seedat Saheb to the questions
that you had posed to him."
ARE YOU NOT DISAPPOINTED AT YOUR STUDENT NOT RESPONDING? SANHA QUOTES THE QUR'AAN TO SHOW THAT THEY ARE NOT HIDING ANYTHING! IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE, THEN THEY SHOULD ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. FURTHERMORE, YOU MUFTI MOTARA, ARE GUILTY OF HIDING THE TRUTH. YOU KNOW OF THE MESS AT RAINBOW AND NOWHERE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO ME HAVE YOU EVEN STATED IT IS HARAAM OR EVEN DOUBTFUL. WHAT TYPE OF A MUFTI ARE YOU? THAT YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN SPEAKING THE TRUTH!
2) MUFTI MOTARA SAYS "If Mufti Muhammed Seedat Saheb had been under our employment and jurisdiction, we could have instructed him to respond to your questions. But you must understand that after leaving the four walls of our institute and taking up employment with SANHA, we cannot dictate terms to him, as he is bound to now abide by the terms of his employment."
YOUR ANSWER IS INCORRECT AND ALSO CORRUPT. MUFTI SEEDAT IS YOUR STUDENT. HE BECAME A MUFTI BY YOU. WHEN YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS SO MUCH CONFUSION AT RAINBOW, THEN WHY HAVE YOU NOT POSED THESE QUESTIONS TO YOUR STUDENT? WHY HAVE YOU NOT INFORMED THE UMMAH IN YOUR LECTURES AND AN-NASIHAH ARTICLES THAT RAINBOW IS DOUBTFUL OR HARAAM? YOU KNOW VERY WELL THAT THE SLAUGHTERERS HAVE STATED IN DOZENS OF AFFIDAVITS THAT THEY DO NOT READ TASMIYAH. YET YOU ARE REMAINING SILENT. YOU ARE AWARE OF NABI SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAMS WARNINGS REGARDING THE ONE WHO REMAINS SILENT WHEN THE HAQ IS TRAMPLED UPON.
I HAVE NOT ASKED YOU TO DICTATE TERMS TO YOUR STUDENT. I HAVE MERELY ASKED YOU TO POSE THESE VERY SAME QUESTIONS TO YOUR STUDENT. BUT YOU MUFTI MOTARA AND MOULANA ABDUL HAMID ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE TRUTH. YOU'LL IGNORE EMAILS AND THINK THAT YOU'LL ARE SERVING THE UMMAH. WE ARE INTERESTED IN HELPING THE UMMAH, BUT EVIL ULAMA LIKE YOURSELVES R NOT INTERESTED.
WHY HAVE YOU NOT POSED THESE QUESTIONS TO YOUR STUDENT? WHY ARE YOU NOT INVOLVED WITH SINCERITY IN THE CHICKEN ISSUE. IT SEEMS AS IF THERE IS SOME CORRUPT ILLEGITIMATE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DARUL ULOOM AZAADVILLE AND SANHA!
3) MUFTI MOTARA - YOU CLAIM: "In other words, he is now formally employed by SANHA and, as an employee, he is under the jurisdiction of his employer. He has to thus abide by the company protocol and internal policy."
WHAT TYPE OF AN USTAAD ARE YOU? YOUR STUDENT IS THE MUFTI OF SANHA AND HE IS YOUR STUDENT? IS THE STUDENT NOT THE SLAVE OF HIS USTAAD FOR LIFETIME? THIS ONCE AGAIN CONFIRMS THAT YOU ARE NOT FROM THE FRATERNITY OF THE ULAMA-E-HAQ. YOU ARE DELIBERATELY TRYING TO PROTECT AND DEFEND YOUR MUFTI SEEDAT STUDENT AND SANHA ALSO! YOUR ARGUMENT OF PROTOCOL AND INTERNAL POLICY IS ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE. WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT TO ANSWER WHEN I ASKED HOW MANY SLAUGHTERERS AND HOW MANY CHICKENS THEY HAVE TO SLAUGHTER. SANHA REFERS A PERSON TO RAINBOW. RAINBOW REFERS A PERSON TO SANHA. AZAADVILLE REFERS PEOPLE TO SANHA. YOU PEOPLE DONT SEEM TO KNOW WHETHER YOU'LL ARE GOING OR COMING.
4) COVERING UP EVEN MORE, YOU SAY: "If it is SANHA's policy not to entertain and reply to certain questions, we have no say in the matter whatsoever. We thus feel that instead of directing this complaint to us, you should rather direct your complaint to his seniors and employers at SANHA. They will be in a better position to inform you why Mufti Muhammed Seedat Saheb deemed it fit not to reply to your questions."
YOU ARE ALSO ONE OF SANHAS FAVORITE MUFTIS JUST LIKE SO-CALLED MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ. SANHA CLAIMS THAT THEY ARE TRANSPARENT. IF YOU WERE A TRUE MUFTI, YOU WOULD HAVE SAID THAT SANHA'S CLAIMS OF TRANSPARENCY ARE FALSE. IT IS WORTHLESS TO DIRECT A COMPLAINT TO HIS SANHA SENIORS. I THOUGHT YOU WERE FROM THE ULAMA-E-HAQ, BUT IT SEEMS AS IF YOU ALL ONE GROUP!
5) MUFTI MOTARA = YOU SAY: 'Your statement that our silence is understood to be in defence of SANHA unfortunately displays your level of ignorance as far as Islamic Fiqh and Jurisprudence is concerned. So let us apprise you of the principle that in terms of Shari'ah, besides Rasulullah sallallahu alaihi wasallam, no one else's silence constitutes approval or justification of any action. Our silence hence does not mean that we approve of all SANHA's activities and modus operandi."
LET ME APPRIZE YOU THAT NABI SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAM SAID THAT THE ONE WHO REMAINS SILENT WHEN THE HAQ IS TRAMPLED UPON, IS A DUMB SHAYTAAN. THUS, THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU TO DEFEND YOUR SILENCE.
I RE-ITERATE: YOUR SILENCE WAS AND IS IN DEFENCE OF SANHA. THE UMMAH IS BEING MISLEAD. AND YOU KNOW THAT THE UMMAH IS BEING MISLED. IF YOU ARE NOT IN DEFENCE OF SANHA, THEN WHY CONDUCT YOURSELF WITH SILENCE? READ THE HADITH ABOVE AGAIN PLEASE -FOR ALLAH'S SAKE.
FURTHERMORE, WHILST YOUR SILENCE DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU APPROVE OF ALL SANHA'S ACTIVITIES, YOU DO APPROVE THAT THE SANHA CHICKENS HALAAL. REMEMBER WELL THAT RADIO ISLAM AIRED ONCE SAID THAT YOU SAID THAT THE CHICKENS ARE HALAAL AND THEN THEY WERE INFORMED THAT YOUR NAME SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE BROADCAST. BUT, AFTER THAT ML NAVLAKHI CONTACTED YOU AND IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE THAT YOU ACTUALLY AGREED WITH MUFTI RAZAULHAQ THAT THE CHICKENS ARE HALAAL?
HOW DID YOU BLINDLY ACCEPT MUFTI RAZAUL HAQS WRONG OPINION OF RAINBOW CHICKENS BEING HALAAL?
DARUL ULOOM AZAADVILLE IS MISLEADING THE UMMAH. YOU ALL KNOW THAT TASMIYAH IS NOT READ ON ALL THE CHICKENS, BUT YOU'LL DONT TELL THE PEOPLE THAT IT IS HARAAM? HOW CAN SUCH SILENCE EVER BE JUSTIFIED AND TOLERABLE TO THE MUSLIM PUBLIC?
LET US ANALYSE MUFTI RAZAUL HAQS FATWA ONLY ON THE TASMIYAH ISSUE. MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD HAVE HUSN-E-ZANN (GOOD THOUGHTS) THAT THE SLAUGHTERERS ARE READING TASMIYAH. BUT THIS IS ALSO A COVER-UP TRICK OF MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ! UNDERSTAND IT THIS WAY. ZAID FOR EXAMPLE IS A SLAUGHTERER. ZAID SAYS THAT HE IS NOT READING TASMIYAH ON EVERY CHICKEN AND MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ AND ALSO SANHA MUFTIS LIKE YOURSELF ARE AWARE OF IT. NOW MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ SAYS THAT WE SHOULD HAVE HUSNE ZANN THAT ZAID IS READING TASMIYAH? HOW CAN WE HAVE HUSNE ZANN THAT ZAID IS READING TASMIYAH WHEN THERE IS YAQEEN THAT ZAID DOES NOT READ TASMIYAH AND HE HIMSELF SAYS THAT HE DOES NOT READ TASMIYAH. I FIND MUFTI RAZAUL HAQS ARGUMENT TO BE IRRATIONAL.
AND YOU MUFTI MOTARA SWALLOWED WHAT MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ HAD TO SAY. THIS IS INJUSTICE AND DISHONESTY. ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE THE SLAUGHTERERS LAIRS? CAN YOU AND ANY OTHER AALIM OR PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD TAKE A QASAM ON THE QUR'AAN THAT TASMIYAH IS READ ON EVERY CHICKEN AND THAT NOT ONE HARAAM CHICKEN WAS FED TO THE UMMAH UNDER SANHA? I CHALLENGE YOU AND ANY ELSE ON THIS ISSUE.
YOU MUFTI MOTARA SHOULD KNOW THAT CHICKENS ALSO DIE OUT OF THE STUNNING? NOW ON WHAT BASIS DID YOU AGREE THAT THE HARAAM RAINBOW CHICKENS ARE HALAAL? FOR 18 YEARS A SLAUGHTERER SAYS THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO SLAUGHTER THE NECESSARY NECK VESSELS, AND A MUFTI LIKE MR RAZAUL HAQ SAYS THAT THEY CAN. AND THEN ALL THE ULAMA THAT TAKE INSPECTIONS OF THE PLANTS WITHOUT SANHA KNOWING, FIND OUT THAT TASMIYAH IS NOT READ AND THE CHICKENS ARE NOT PROPERLY SLAUGHTERED.
INTELLIGENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!
FURTHERMORE, STUNNING IS HARAAM WHICH EVEN LEADS TO THE DEATH OF THE ANIMAL, BUT HAVE YOU EVER PUBLICLY ENCOURAGED THE MUSLIM PUBLIC TO ABSTAIN FROM THE HARAAM CHICKEN, MUTTON AND BEEF? YOU HAVE NOT! AND WHY NOT! WHAT TYPE OF A HEAD MUFTI ARE YOU OF AZAADVILE? ARE YOU NOW BECOMING LIKE MUFTI RAZAUL HAQ??????
6) MUFTI MOTARA - YOU SAY"As for the duty of enjoining the good and forbidding the wrong, there are a number of issues that we have brought to SANHA's attention that need to be reviewed and addressed. That is entirely confidential between us and SANHA."
THIS IS HYPOCRISY. WHY HAVE YOU NOT ENJOINED GOOD AND FORBIDDEN THE WRONG PUBLICLY? WHY HAVE YOU NOT INFORMED THE UMMAH PUBLICLY THAT STUNNING IS HARAAM? WHY DONT YOU PUBLICLY SPEAK ON THESE ISSUES? THE REASONS ARE OBVIOUS! YOU AND DARUL ULOOM AZAADVILE HAVE A HARAAM RELATIONSHIP WITH SANHA. SANHA RECENTLY PUBLICIZED THAT THE DARUL ULOOM STUDENTS HAVE TRAINING WITH SANHA. SO YOUR STUDENTS ARE TRAINED BY SANHA! ARE YOU SO CORRUPT THAT YOU ALLOW YOUR STUDENTS TO BE TRAINED BY SANHA?
SANHA INDULGES IN MUCH HARAAM, BUT YOU ALLOW YOUR STUDENTS TO HAPPILY BE UNDER THEM! THIS IS TREACHERY FOR AN AALIM WHO IS REGARDED TO BE A GUIDE. RATHER, YOU ARE A MISGUIDE!
THEN, SANHA OPERATES WITH THE JAMIAT. AT THE JAMIAT IS MUFTI ZAKARIYYA PANDOR WHO IS YOUR STUDENT ALSO. HIS FATWAS ARE VERY QUESTIONABLE! SO YOU DONT SPEAK AGAINST THE EVILS OF RADIO ISLAM, THE EVILS OF SANHA AND THE EVILS OF THE JAMIAT BECAUSE YOU ARE PART OF THESE ULAMA - NOTHING ELSE.
THEN THE MUSLIM SCHOOLS. THE CONFERENCE WAS HELD AT THE MUSLIM SCHOOL. YOU KNOW THAT THE MUSLIM SCHOOLS INDULGE IN MUCH HARAAM AND DONT MAKE PROPER HIJAAB. AND THE MUSLIM SCHOOL IN AZAADVILLE HAD A NETBALL TOURNAMENT NEXT TO YOUR DARUL ULOOM!!! AND YOUR STUDENT MR ZAKARIYYA PANDOR TRIED TO DEFEND ALL THIS HARAAM! THE GIRLS WERE NOT DRESSED UP PROPERLY AND YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER!
NOW THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AZAADVILLE AND SANHA AND THE JAMIAT IS EVEN MORE CLEAR.
LET US GO FURTHER! ZAMHA IS RUN BY SOME MUFTI ROCKET PATEL WHO ALSO BECAME A MUFTI BY YOU. BUT THIS JUNIOR SPEAKS NONSENSE IN THE NAME OF DEEN. THEREFORE, MY FRIENDS IN ZAMBIA CALL HIM MUFTI ZIGZAG. THE NAME ZAMHA RHYMES WITH SANHA. IN FACT, MUFTI ZAMBIAN ZIGZAG IS FOR SANHA. HE IS JUST LIKE YOU. THE ILLEGITIMATE BIRTH OF ZAMHA TOOK PLACE WITH THE BLESSINGS OF SANHA. SANHA WAS THE MOTHER. THE FATHER HAS TO BE AZAADVILLE - ML ABDUL HAMID AND MF MOTARA JOINTLY!
SO YOURS AND AZAADVILLES THREE CORRUPT MUFTI STUDENTS - MUFTI SEEDAT OF SANHA, MUFTI ZAIGZAG OF ZAMHA AND MUFTI ZAKARIYYA PANDOR OF THE JAMIAT. THEN THERE IS NO PROPER PURDAH AT THE MAKTABS OF THE JAMIAT AND MUFTI ZAK PANDOR TEACHES AT ONE OF THESE MADRASAHS. DESPITE THE FACT THAT AZAADVILE KNOWS THAT THERE IS NO PURDAH AT THE MAKTABS, AZAADVILE SENDS THEIR STUDENTS EVERY YEAR TO THESE MAKTABS. THIS MAKES THE CORRUPT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AZAADVILE, THE JAMIAT, SANHA, AND THE CORRUPT EVIL MUSLIM SCHOOLS EVEN CLEARER. ADDED TO THIS IS THE EVIL DARUL ULOOM ZAKARIYYA WHICH EVEN HAS FAASIQ QAARIS TEACHING. ML SALOOJEE IS MISLEADING THE UMMAH.
THE HAQ WHICH MUST BE SPEAKEN TO THE PUBLIC IS REGARDED AS CONFIDENTIAL BY YOU. YOU ARE TRYING TO COVER UP.......
7) MUFI MOTARA SAYS "A word of advice in parting, that when posing questions to any organization, one should pose the questions in a more dignified manner and not in a manner of an armchair critic who poses his questions in a high-handed, dictatorial and imperious manner. Due to the manner of your approach, we also had the right not to respond to your email addressed to us to, but we have overlooked your naivety and replied to your email."
YOUR FATWAS ON COMMERCIAL MEAT PRODUCTS REFLECT YOUR STATUS. WHAT DIGNITY SHOULD WE SHOW TO ULAMA WHO HIDE THE TRUTH?
DARUL ULOOM AZAADVILE AND DARUL ULOOM ZAKARIYYA MAY NOT BE CONTACTED FOR FATWAS. YOUR FATWAS ARE CORRUPT AND YOU'LL ARE ALIGNED TO THE TV-RADIO MOLVIS. YOU'LL ARE FEEDING THE UMMAH HARAAM.
YOUR CORRUPT STUDENTS REFLECT YOUR OWN MENTALITY AND YOUR CORRUPT WAY OF THINKING!
YOU WILL BE QUESTIONED ON THE DAY OF QIYAAMAH FOR ALL YOUR SILENCE.
SPEAK UP BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
10 Rabiul Awwal 1436 2 January 2015
KNOW WHO ARE THE SHIAHS
The greatest threat for the Ummah in this era is the Shiah menace. Aiding the spread of the Shiah menace are some deviant ulama-e-soo’, especially those associated with the NNB Jamiat of Fordsburg, who minister to the evil designs of Shi’ism. Muslims should not allow themselves to be deluded by sinister agents who, despite parading themselves as members of the Ahlus Sunnah, advocate coexistence with Shiahs who slander the Sahaabah, and who subscribe to many beliefs of flagrant kufr which locks them out of the fold of Islam without the slightest doubt. The following are some of their vile beliefs and tenets:
* Shiahs believe that the vast majority of the Sahaabah became murtadd after the demise of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
* Shiahs slander Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) with the accusation of adultery.
* Shiahs believe that Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar and Hadhrat Uthmaan (radhiyallahu anhum) are the worst munaafiqeen, and that they had usurped the Khilaafate. As a religious obligation Shiahs recite ‘curses’ on these Khulafa.
* Shiahs believe that the Qur’aan which we have is a fabrication, having been fabricated by the Sahaabah.
* Shiahs believe that the ‘true’ Qur’aan will be brought by Imaam Mahdi who is currently hiding with it in a cave according to their concocted doctrines.
* Shiahs have a practice called mutah which is ‘holy’ prostitution. They term it ‘temporary marriage’. For a sum of money the satanic ‘marriage’ of even an hour is valid. This religious prostitution shall be explained in greater detail in a subsequent article, Insha-Allah.
* Shiahs have a belief called Taqya (holy hypocrisy) which allows and encourages them to conceal their true beliefs of kufr and immorality to hoodwink Muslims into believing that they (the Shiahs) are Muslims. They will brazenly deny and conceal all the KUFR which is attributed to them in order to infiltrate the ranks of Muslims.
BEWARE OF SHIAHS! DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THEIR LIES AND FALSE CLAIM OF BEING MUSLIMS
21 JANUARY 2016
THE DEVIANT ULEMA
By a CONCERNED MUSLIM from Kwazulu-Natal
Today we are being attacked from within the Ummat. And now the attacks are from within the Ulema. Any person who is deemed by some of the Ulema to be 'intolerant' of another Muslim's actions, beliefs or viewpoint, is deemed to be an outcast, a fitna monger, an intolerant person etc etc.
Quran ayat are quoted as well as hadeeth commanding unity of the Ummat. Hadeeth are quoted that if we have nothing good to say we should not speak.
I remember hearing and then asking from Ulema to verify the following hadeeth.
Referring to the Hadith in Tirmizi Shareef in which the 3 duas of Nabi alaihis salaam are mentioned as follows
1. Allah must not destroy the ummat through famine. This dua was accepted
2. Allah must not cause the enemies to overpower and dominate the ummat. This dua was accepted
3. Allah must not cause in-fighting amongst the ummat. This dua was not accepted.
There are now 3 groups distinctly appearing who state publicly and are able to influence the majority of Muslims that for the sake of Islam we should tolerate, love and be together for the sake of UNITY, with all Muslims.
The 3 groups I have observed are as follows:
1. From amongst our Darul Ulooms Ulema who say we should accept, love, tolerate and be together with the barelvis and Deobandi Ulema who have other viewpoints (for example Mufti Taqhi Uthmani) re photography, riba, carrion, stunning, be-purdah, women driving, medical aid, insurance, women working, studying, tv, radio molvis etc, etc. They state that we should NEVER publicly run down any of the Ulema who advocate these fitan, otherwise we are the ones creating disunity in the Ummat which is a grave sin. I have this even from our jamiat of KZN told directly to me.
2. Our Ulema and other modernist Ulema who embrace the salafs as well as the shias and those found in the group above.
3. Even more modern Ulema who are twisting the interpretation and explanation of the Quran to say that we should embrace, accept and love the kuffaar as we are ONE umma. Yes many so called pseudo islamic countries and their Ulema are advocating this. Even in South Africa a person who studied the Aalim course, Ebrahim Bham of Newtown musjid is amongst these…regarding this fitan it has now become compulsory in the filthy schools to even teach children that all religions are equal. After all if the Ulema like many ulema of other countries and Ebrahim Bham say so, what is there if the filthy schools teach Muslim children this.
Muhtarram Moulana Saheb my question is this:
1. Are we supposed to strive for unity of the Ummat and overlook those who openly advocate breaking the sharia?
2. Can Muhtarram Moulana Saheb kinldy forward me many ahadeeth of different instances where Rasulula salllalahu alaih wa salaam was prepared to make war against his own Muslims, or alienate them, or not talk to them or dispute with them, or punish them, because they decided to challenge and break the sharia. Due to lack of Ulema Haq being on the mimbars family members, the community, the ummat listens to smooth talking wayward Ulema who are able to convince the Ummat that all the above fitan are ok. (gambling, zina, photography, striving to join and be amongst those doing this etc)
With particular reference to when and how should a Muslim strive for unity and when we should disunite if at all, for the sake of the sharia.
If Muhtarram Moulana Saheb would address the above with proof from hadeeth and quran in a booklet form it will help a lot. It is much needed in this time.
The response to your questions are:
1. Unity with falsehood and error is not permissible. Unity in conflict with the command of the Qur’aan and Sunnah is a devilish deception. It was this type of unity which the mushrikeen of Makkah had demanded from Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and it was this type of baseless and satanic unity which evoked from Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) the response: “Even if you put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left hand, I shall not desist….”
Islam came to create the greatest disunity in mankind on the basis of Tauheed thereby splitting people into Mu’min and Kaafir. The type of unity which these misguided Ulema are seeking is of the kind demanded by the mushrikeen and which shaitaan propagates.
2. Your second question requires a detailed discussion. Insh’Allah, such a discussion shall be forthcoming.
3. In brief, for the sake of the Shariah, unity on the basis of falsehood is just not permissible. Everything that is in conflict with the Shariah is falsehood. The Shariah is the only Law to which Muslims have to submit. A unity raised on an unlawful basis is haraam. The disunity for the sake of Allah Ta’ala, and for upholding His Shariah, is a higly meritorious and rewardable deed.